Opti Lab Research
|
|
Research in the Opti Lab addresses neurocognitive processes that underlie human learning and techniques that can be used to accelerate skill acquisition. Our research spans basic, applied and clinical sciences with a focus on the neural mechanisms of visual information processing and precision sensorimotor control. As a core lab in the Brain Stimulation Division of Duke Psychiatry our research features a number of noninvasive brain stimulation approaches, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulate neural functioning, as well as multiple neural recording techniques such as electroencephlography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Specific areas of research include:
|
A key element of research in the Opti Lab has been experimentation with sensorimotor training tools, including several developed by Nike Inc. Through research supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Army Research Office (ARO), we have conducted laboratory and field studies in unique groups of expert athletes and soldiers, leading to several papers addressing perceptual and motor expertise. Among these are studies addressing …
- Sensorimotor expertise in athletes (Klemish, 2017; Burris et al, 2018)
- Sports vision training (Appelbaum & Erickson 2016; Krasich 2016; Appelbaum 2016; Wang et al., 2015)
- Stroboscopic training (Appelbaum 2011, Appelbaum 2012)
- Visual training as an remediation for lower extremity injury (Gromes 2014)
- Sensorimotor learning in immersive virtual environments (Rao et al, 2018; Clements et al 2018)
Strobe Training
|
Nike Sensory Station
|
Training Study with Duke Basketball Team
|
Brain stimulation techniques such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) offer the powerful means by which to noninvasively modulate neural function. Research in our lab is interested in the application of such neuromodulation techniques to improve cognitive faculties, emotional regulation, and motor function. Among these studies is a U01 award through the National Institute for Aging to study the combination of working memory training and TMS for improving working memory abilities that typically decline with age (see Clinical Trial registry, here). We have also recently received a BRAIN Initiative award with colleagues in the School of Engineering and in the Departments of Psychology and Neurology to investigate dose-response relationships underlying repetitive TMS through systematic studies in both humans and non-human primates. In another exciting line of research done in conjunction with the Department of Surgery, we are currently developing a surgical training program that utilizes tDCS and eye tracking to facilitate laparoscopic skill learning in medical residents in the Duke cardiothoracic training program.
- rTMS to enhance working memory abilities (Beynel et al, BioRxiv, 2018)
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to accelerate laparoscopic skill learning (Cox et al, Under Review)- Clinical Trial Registry
- TMS produces temporally distinct interruption to perceptual discrimination (Luber et al, BioRxiv)
Vision is the result of numerous microprocesses that determine the scope and limits of perception and subsequent cognition. Research in the Opti Lab has addressed a number key topics relating to the processes and neural mechanisms underlying visual perception and cognition. These include
- Steady State Visually Evoked Potential (SSVEP) to study scene perception (Appelbaum 2006; Appelbaum 2008; Appelbaum 2009; Appelbaum 2010; Appelbaum 2012; Ales 2013; Norcia et al 2015)
- Perceptual Learning and Neuroplasticity (Clark 2015; San Martin 2013; San Martin 2015 )
- Individual Differences in Perception (Appelbaum 2013)
- The time course of executive control in the brain (Appelbaum et al. 2009; Appelbaum et al. 2012; Appelbaum et al. 2014; Donohue et al 2016)
- Conflict and reward (Krebs et al. 2013)
- Multisensory integration (Donohue et al. 2013; Appelbaum et al. 2013)
- Response inhibition (Boehler et al. 2010; Boehler et al. 2011; Boehler et al. 2012)
